The right of an employee to union representation during an investigatory interview that could result in disciplinary action is a key element of labor law. This right, established by the Supreme Court in NLRB v. J. Weingarten, Inc., is often associated with unionized workplaces. However, the applicability of this principle to non-union settings has been a subject of ongoing legal debate and varying interpretations. For example, if a non-union employee believes a meeting with management could lead to disciplinary action, they might inquire about having a coworker present.
The potential extension of this representational right to non-union employees is significant because it can offer a degree of protection against unfair or coercive questioning during workplace investigations. This potential protection could lead to fairer disciplinary processes and potentially reduce wrongful terminations. Historically, the focus has been on collective bargaining units, yet the core concept addresses a power imbalance inherent in many employer-employee relationships. Clarifying this right for all employees could significantly impact workplace dynamics.